Home Cricket News AUS vs WI: The Dispute Over A Runout In The Match Raises Questions About MCC Laws Regarding Appeals

AUS vs WI: The Dispute Over A Runout In The Match Raises Questions About MCC Laws Regarding Appeals

0
AUS vs WI: The Dispute Over A Runout In The Match Raises Questions About MCC Laws Regarding Appeals

Cricket, a sport known for its uniqueness, showcased a noteworthy incident during the Australia vs West Indies second T20 International on February 11, 2024, at the Adelaide Oval.

Australia missed a wicket opportunity with Alzarri Joseph, as they failed to appeal for a runout, despite conclusive replays indicating he was short of the crease. According to cricket laws, the umpire can declare a batter out only if the fielding team makes a formal appeal.

As per the overseer of the sport, in accordance with Marylebone Cricket Club rule 31.1, the umpire is not to declare the batter out unless there is a formal appeal. 

“Neither umpire shall give a batter out, even though he/she may be out under the Laws, unless appealed to by a fielder.  This shall not debar a batter who is out under any of the Laws from leaving the wicket without an appeal having been made.”

The MCC laws also explain when a batter will be deemed dismissed. “A batter is dismissed if he/she is either given out by an umpire, on appeal or out under any of the Laws and leaves the wicket as in 31.1.”

What precisely occurred in the second T20 match between Australia and West Indies in Adelaide?

In pursuit of 242 runs, West Indies, with nine wickets down in the 19th over, experienced a runout as Alzarri attempted a single. Spencer Johnson, after receiving the ball from Mitchell Marsh, dislodged the stumps. With the target practically unreachable, there was minimal excitement from the fielders, and Johnson was returning to his mark.

Despite the big screen showing Joseph clearly out of his ground, the on-field umpire Abood declared, “No appeal.” Tim David contested, claiming he did appeal, but Abood maintained his decision. Ultimately, Johnson was dismissed, leading to Australia’s 34-run victory.

What statements were made regarding the runout controversy? 

Glenn Maxwell: “I think the umpire deemed that no one had appealed, and there was a few of us that thought we did appeal. To be fair, I understand; it wasn’t like it was a screaming appeal from everyone, but it was probably one of those things where you expect it to go up to the third umpire; we thought it was pretty close, and there were a few of us putting our hands up.”

“We sort of stopped, thinking he’d sent it upstairs, and everyone was turned around watching the big screen and the batter had already started walking off. So it was just confusing – thank God it didn’t cost the game. Just one of those weird rules in cricket, we should probably just be a bit louder with our appeals.”


Get the latest cricket news here, like us on Facebook, and follow us on Twitter and Instagram for more such updates.

Latest Posts