
Dasun Shanaka, a prominent Sri Lankan cricketer, has found himself at the center of a controversy after allegations surfaced that he left a first-class match in Colombo earlier than expected to play for the Dubai Capitals in the ILT20 tournament. Sri Lanka Cricket (SLC) has announced an inquiry into the matter, raising questions about the ethical responsibilities of professional players and their commitments to domestic teams.
Background on Dasun Shanaka’s alleged actions
Shanaka was one of three players called back from the ILT20 by his first-class club, SSC, to help them avoid relegation in the Major League Tournament. He played for SSC on February 1 and 2, bowling 21 overs, taking a wicket, and scoring 123 runs across two innings. However, on day three, he was notably absent from the game’s concluding stages.
On February 2, after a strong performance for SSC, Shanaka was alleged to have left the match early. Hours later, he was spotted in Dubai, playing for the Dubai Capitals, where he delivered an explosive 34 off 12 balls. While such a transition between domestic and franchise cricket has happened before, the nature of his early exit has raised suspicions.
Allegations against Dasun Shanaka
One of the most striking allegations in the case is that match referee Wendell Labrooy was misled into believing that Shanaka had suffered a concussion, allowing a substitute to replace him. If proven, this claim could have serious consequences for the player and those involved.
While players often have to balance domestic and franchise commitments, leaving a match mid-way raises concerns about integrity. Cricket boards worldwide have strict policies about player availability, and Shanaka’s alleged actions have put him at risk of disciplinary action.
SLC’s Stance and Inquiry Details
Ashley de Silva, the CEO of SLC, has confirmed the inquiry, stating that SSC is also conducting its own investigation. This suggests that the case is being taken seriously, and if found guilty, Shanaka could face repercussions, including suspension or fines.
This is according to SLC CEO Ashley de Silva, who told ESPNcricinfo “SSC [Shanaka’s first-class club] would probably be conducting their own inquiry as well”.
SSC, being the club affected by Shanaka’s alleged early exit, has a vested interest in ensuring fair play. Their internal investigation will determine if he breached club policies and if any steps should be taken against him.

Comparisons with Past Incidents
Some have compared this situation to when Lasith Malinga played for Mumbai Indians and later played a domestic match in Pallekele. However, the key difference is that Malinga did not abandon his domestic commitments mid-game.
If found guilty, Shanaka could face fines, suspension from domestic cricket, or even a temporary national team ban. This incident may also impact his reputation among selectors.
Get the latest cricket news here, like us on Facebook, and follow us on Twitter and Instagram for more such updates.
![[WATCH]- Viral Vaibhav Suryavanshi Clip Prompts Clarification From Harsha Bhogle](https://cricfit.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/IMG_4140-100x75.webp)

![[WATCH] RCB Stars Pull Off Fun Water Prank on Coach During Title Celebrations](https://cricfit.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/IMG_3872-100x75.webp)

![[WATCH]- Virat Kohli Teases Krunal Pandya After All-Rounder Flaunts Five IPL Titles](https://cricfit.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/IMG_3863-100x75.webp)